You can find the latest Leonard Brandt letter 8 August 2014, published at http://www.cdapress.com/. Otherwise, I will discuss certain of its absurdities here. At least Mr. Brandt did introduce an interpretation of fascism that I best understand as well: people who dictate to you, how you should think. People who declare with whom you may properly associate with and further, whom you ought to serve: IE in business, as a customer. In short, fascism is bigotry personified and glorified through and by government itself. I have heard that fascists had praised “capitalism.” Precisely, that form of capitalism, that had no qualms trading with the enemy before or during times of war. But in Mr. Brandt’s case, “fascism” is now forcing a business run by Mr. Brandt, to serve customers who are among the LGBT community. Which I regard as interesting. Even more interesting is how he uses Jesus to argue how much of a victim he has become.
A couple of points to be made here: Jesus’ position on “the enemy” can be found in a scripture in Luke, “Love even your enemy, pray for those who persecute you.” If Mr. Brandt feels he is being persecuted for example: running a restaurant and having to serve dinner to a gay or lesbian couple (and quite frankly, he wouldn’t know if they are or are not). He already has a biblical scripture that requires of him to serve them regardless. “For God makes the sun to shine on the good and the evil, the rain to fall on both the righteous and unrighteous.” Literally, a love that does not allow you to discriminate. As opposed to fascism, that indeed prefers that you can do so, with predictably deadly consequences. Mr. Brandt’s real argument seems to be: “fascism” is telling him he can not discriminate against some customers, through an example of refusing to serve them and finally shoving them out the door. Nor allow that he can show a more favorable attitude toward others, who are deemed to be his kind of people. In other words, the Jesus he wants to prop up his letter, is a Fascist. Or politically correct. It says, what of the bible Mr. Brandt did not read today.
Quite frankly, I am afraid that Mr. Brandt lost me when he started whining at the LGBT being able to claim American rights for themselves, that quite literally he could personally take for granted. Therefore in history, Fascism is revealed as official government bigotry. That bigotry which was aimed as a deadly weapon against some people, first by making them non-citizens, and finally subjecting such people to the most brutal of assaults, etc. that was possible. Gays and lesbians, gypsies, Jews, and etc. were among the unwelcome “pestilence” that made the “host nation and its people” weak. With reference to Hitler and Mussolini. Oh yes, that kind of fascism. Is Mr. Brandt facing a Kristallnacht (sic?) if a couple of gays want to be married and choose Mr. Brandt’s commercial business, for catering services at their wedding? No. Nor is he facing the destruction of property, if for religious reasons, he wants to refuse to offer his services to this particular couple. But if he knows what the “thou shalt not discriminate laws” are; then he is at his own risk for a valid lawsuit and fines, for failing to comply with anti-discriminatory laws. Laws that say you can not discriminate, are not “fascist.” Jesus himself who said that “love must be perfect” (again with reference to Luke) was never a Fascist. Question: given the letter that Mr. Brandt had published, what then does that make him?